- Joined
- Feb 4, 2022
- Messages
- 2,554
- Reaction score
- 1,720
YesDid it ever?
This is Netanyahu’s war, one that he has long sought, and quite possibly one of which it will eventually be learned that he arranged and staged. We may even need to coin a new term for this sort of war, because if it is true that Netanyahu not only permitted, but was involved in encouraging the attacks, “green flag” wouldn’t suffice to describe it. “Puppet flag” would be more accurate.
That chap sounds like he’s reading from a script. Not one word wasted. His delivery straight after the question is answered has no delay. It’s not a natural conversation, and his answers are purposefully inflammatory. It reeks of propaganda.Hamas founder's defector son says they want to 'annihilate Jews'
Mosab Hassan Yousef, referred to as the 'Green Prince', spied on Hamas for Israel between 1997 and 2007. His intelligence prevented suicide bomb attacks and other strikes.www.dailymail.co.uk
"In a series of interviews with American media outlets today, he warned that his father and Hamas will not be satisfied with taking territorial Palestine alone, and that they are fighting a religious war to which there is no end for them.
'They are a religious movement this is what everybody is afraid to say. If Hamas was a political movement, we could satisfy their political ambition.
'But Hamas is a religious movement that does not believe in political borders - they want to establish an Islamic state on the rubble of the state of Israel."
Jonathan Pollard, the US traitor and spy whose loyalty to Israel cannot possibly be questioned, has testified that IDF helicopter pilots received a stand-down order on October 7th that prevented them from responding to the Hamas attacks for six hours that day:
You're talking about Trump now?His delivery straight after the question is answered has no delay. It’s not a natural conversation, and his answers are purposefully inflammatory.
If it was posted by the site pervert, it's propaganda. It's all it's given to work with.That chap sounds like he’s reading from a script. Not one word wasted. His delivery straight after the question is answered has no delay. It’s not a natural conversation, and his answers are purposefully inflammatory. It reeks of propaganda.
The guy in who gave the interview with Piers Morgan is straight out of ‘central casting’.If it was posted by the site pervert, it's propaganda. It's all it's given to work with.