Nope, you set up your own thread because you and James were failing miserably in our discussion and you needed a safe haven. Which is why you banned me from it.
The only posts I ever removed were mindless abuse from James, nothing to do with any debate. James was drunk and spamming
Your dismissal, laced with weary condescension, is less an argument and more a defense mechanism. Saying “I’ve heard it all before” isn’t a rebuttal—it’s a way of shielding yourself from engagement. And yet, ironically, your complete inability to answer even basic challenges shows you clearly haven’t heard it before—or at least, never understood it. What you have “heard” are caricatures filtered through the echo chamber of materialist apologetics, not serious arguments demanding serious response.
You mock “mud men” and “rib women” while faithfully adhering to your own creation myth: that a cosmos burst from nothing without cause, that inorganic matter sprang to life without intention, and that consciousness is a biochemical accident. You accuse others of magical thinking while invoking a liturgy of unobservable, unrepeatable events you accept on institutional authority. That’s not science—it’s scientism. And your “technical explanations” never seem to touch the core: why anything exists, why order emerges, or why truth matters at all.
You reject metaphysics and then smuggle it in through the back door under names like “emergence” or “natural selection.” The Bible speaks in symbols of eternal truths you cannot measure but which govern all that is—meanwhile, your worldview is a ghost town of unaccountable abstractions.
When pressed, you return to sneers, not substance. Because at bottom, this isn’t about evidence. It’s about allegiance—to a system that cannot tolerate contradiction, and to a narrative that needs the protection of scorn to survive scrutiny.
www.facebook.com
www.facebook.com
