- Joined
- Jan 11, 2023
- Messages
- 3,554
- Reaction score
- 3,326
the same matter you yourself were referencing with your own comment.Could you clarify what the "matter" is?
the same matter you yourself were referencing with your own comment.Could you clarify what the "matter" is?
Clearly there are people on this thread (the usual suspects) who don't believe the story because of their own personal religious belief (being special).. therein ends the discussion.
I think this meme says all we need to on the matter nowRather than make me guess, why don't you just say what you fucking mean, r u talking about atheism, being visited by LGM, flat Earth, what?
I was referring to -
There is absolutely no such thing as any life outside earth.
..in a reply to a post by @Tuco Salamanca, which was a reply to a post by @scolairebocht, in which those words were highlighted (in bold)
And that means that the conclusion should be, 100%, that there isn't?
Why r u talking about something that wasn't being discussed?
I most certainly didn't "learn" anything from you merely stating a fact (there's no proof for life outside of Earth). You're not even a midwit, you're a 90 IQer who thinks he's a fucking sage
I do not follow people down their garden path (said this just recently).
If you want to eh, expand the discussion then do this:
1. Acknowledge that what I was talking about is not what you're talking about and indeed was not the discussion
and
2. Comment on what was being discussed, namely - "There is absolutely no such thing as any life outside earth."
If you comply with both then, maybe, maybe, we'll explore your garden path
As stated earlier.How massive would you say this claim is -
"There is absolutely no such thing as any life outside earth."
After all, that was what was being responded to
There was no "doubt", whatsoever, expressed. That's basically the point
You mean when you spelled Carl Sagan wrong?
Again, what is your point? THIS was the statement -
"There is absolutely no such thing as any life outside earth."
Do you ANY of you people want to have a go at WHY someone would say that?!
So you think that this is possibly true?
Huge claims need massive evidence.
Simply put.
I'm a fence-sitter when it comes to extraterrestrial visitation but I thoroughly agree with this.You have to read the source material before you engage in the discussion. I provided the portion that was relevant to your assertion. What do you think of it?
There is absolutely no proof of life outside Earth - there is a reasonable suspicion, which may be enough to fund research, but is not enough to alter policy or body of facts.
Sure. Here is the answer:Anyone, anyone want to have a go at WHY someone would say this -
"There is absolutely no such thing as any life outside earth."
I'd be amazed if life didn't exist elsewhere in the galaxy to start.I do think there are enough cases of something happening as regards UFOs and supposed "aliens" that cannot be explained merely by secret government technology, strange weather phenomena, mental illness or weird glitches in people's psyches, etc.
I read think interesting booklet that suggested that there could other intelligent flesh and blood species on this planet who are far older than we are hiding out who are the ones pretending to be aliens. Than they could be mischievous beings from an another dimension also on this earth similar to what our ancestors reported around fairies, demons, jinn, etc. The fact that the way their flying machines, etc look keeps changing in line with our technology or technological imagination in a lot of the reports I think says something.
lol Take your toys and fuck off then.
I think a contempt for the religious only increases being surrounded by you dumb, obnoxious assholes.
Anyone, anyone want to have a go at WHY someone would say this -
"There is absolutely no such thing as any life outside earth."
It was long ago, years before I demonstrated the mathematical impossibility of the current synthesis of the theory of evolution by natural selection with genetic science, that I declared evolutionists were going to have to develop a new theory of evolution. And now, lo and behold, some of the evolutionists themselves are finally beginning to reach the same conclusion due to the total failure of their pet theory as a useful predictive or explanatory model.
This is all is pretty tongue-in-cheek and quite a stretch. I also recognize that this idea, when you simmer it down, is more or less stolen from Buddhism. By mind is the world made, by world is the mind made.Did you read this? I suppose the portion you're referring to is from the end of the document.
Question 3: I haven't read everything in detail but can you expend on the document on their religion?
EBOs [Exo-Biospheric-Organisms] believe that the soul is not an extension of the individual, but rather a fundamental characteristic of nature that expresses itself as a field, not unlike gravity. In the presence of life, this field acquires complexity, resulting in negative entropy [tendency towards order] if that makes sense. This gain in complexity is directly correlated with the concentration of living organisms in a given location. With time, and with the right conditions, life in turn becomes more complex until the appearance of sentient life. After reaching this threshold, the field begins to express itself through these sentient beings, forming what we call the soul. Through their life experiences, sentient beings will in turn influence the field in a sort of positive feedback loop. This in turn further accelerates the complexity of the field. Eventually, when the field reaches a "critical mass", there will be a sort of apotheosis. It's not clear what this means in practical terms, but this quest for apotheosis seems to be the EBOs main motivation.
The author of the document added his reflections and interpretations as an appendix. He specified that, for them, the soul field is not a belief but an obvious truth. He also argues that the soul loses its individuality after death, but that memory and experience persist as part of the field. This fact would influence the philosophy and culture of EBOs, resulting in a society that doesn't fear death but which places no importance or reverence on individuality. This "belief" compels them to seed life, shape it, nurture it, monitor it and influence it for the ultimate purpose of creating this apotheosis. Paradoxically, they have little or no respect for an individual's well-being.
Please be advised that I'm speaking from memory of something I read more than 10 years ago, so take the following with a grain of salt. Also, I'm not a philosopher or an artist, so please excuse my struggle to properly formulate the concepts and my dry terminology. Finally, note that this information comes from a document whose author was directly interacting with an EBO. It is not specified whether it was an ambassador, a crash survivor, a prisoner. The means of communication were not specified either.
Something similar surfaced recently. There's an analogous pattern in how it's written.
Biologics created by some intelligence as tools, with a mixture of terrestrial and artificial body mapping, who have a weak immune system, no survival related capability, night sight, are wrapped in a bio-film, excrete through their skin and live off hummingbird soup.
The anthropologists who interviewed the alien to document their hive precept should get a Noble Prize. The "guy" did not use poorly developed concepts or dry terminology. Life is a materialistic precursor. Consciousness is a boson of some undiscovered field. Memory and experience are the content of immortality. Transcendent purpose is the movement towards evolved divinity.
It's a trans-humanist confection, clearly a product of Scientific Millennialism.