Tuam excavation begins

No human being has the right to use another person's body to stay alive without their ongoing consent.
So you would agree then that a parent has the right to be neglectful of their child, up to and including allowing them to starve to death? 🤔

We apply this rule everywhere else. You cannot legally force someone to donate blood or a kidney to save a dying person.
Is this why @Tiger keeps on saying that you engage in strawman fallacies?

Withdrawing bodily support from a fetus when it means protecting a womans own physical health and safety is, fundamentally, a form of self-defense.
I wouldn't necessarily disagree with the terminology here.. But you're just picking "hard cases" again, aren't you. That's not what 'abortion on demand' is
 
Well I don't. I use a seperate editor and copy it in.
The Office Lol GIF
 
Is this why @Tiger keeps on saying that you engage in strawman fallacies?
I take the arguments to the logical conclusions.
Tiger wants to pick and choose, to generate highly artifical and tightly controled arguments, and bat away all the questions that immediately arise as "strawmen".
Its just dishonest really. And obvious.
 
I take the arguments to the logical conclusions.
You wouldn’t know a logical conclusion if it hit you in the head 🤣
Tiger wants to pick and choose, to generate highly artifical and tightly controled arguments, and bat away all the questions that immediately arise as "strawmen".
Its just dishonest really. And obvious.
For example, the immigration debate arose by me throwing your own question back at you and switching Ireland for another randomly chosen country in the world.

A question which you’ve been evading (badly) since.
 
No—you appear to be making an entirely different point. You have to explain how your point follows from mine
If a child doesn't have a right to depend on another person's body to stay alive, then why is child neglect illegal?
 
You wouldn’t know a logical conclusion if it hit you in the head 🤣

For example, the immigration debate arose by me throwing your own question back at you and switching Ireland for another randomly chosen country in the world.

A question which you’ve been evading (badly) since.
You played the "majority rules" card on immigration.
I can get behind that.
Did you know a majority of countries legalise abortion in some form?
 
Man, there's some serious trolling going on here.
It's funny.
Yup.

‘Haven’ is an online troll formally known as ‘Tank’ on Political Irish. He spent 10-15 hours a day shilling for big pharmaceutical companies for about 4 years during Covid.

He’s a ‘Normie’ par excellence.
 
If a child doesn't have a right to depend on another person's body to stay alive, then why is child neglect illegal?
When a child is born, their survival no longer requires the use of someones body.

Child neglect laws require that the child gets external care (like food and shelter) or that care is transfered to another person.
 
Yup.

‘Haven’ is an online troll formally known as ‘Tank’ on Political Irish. He spent 10-15 hours a day shilling for big pharmaceutical companies for about 4 years during Covid.

He’s a ‘Normie’ par excellence.
Takes all sorts I suppose.
 
Man, there's some serious trolling going on here.
It's funny.
Just pointing out how poor these arguments are.

I'm actually astonished, to be honest.

There are far better ways to make their points but I'm sure as fuck not going to help them.
 
You played the "majority rules" card on immigration.
I can get behind that.
Did you know a majority of countries legalise abortion in some form?
Nope.

I simply highlighted that you can’t even muster a basic case for why anyone on the planet can magically become ‘Irish’, but Irish people aren’t afforded the same magic anywhere.

In fact I asked you to list the countries where they could…still waiting on that list btw…

No One Page GIF
 
Nope.

I simply highlighted that you can’t even muster a basic case for why anyone on the planet can magically become ‘Irish’, but Irish people aren’t afforded the same magic anywhere.

In fact I asked you to list the countries where they could…still waiting on that list btw…

No One Page GIF
I don't have to because I told you I accepted your argument on immigration. Majority rules.

Regarding abortion, those countries that legalise it make up 60% of the worlds population.

Majority rules. Debate over.
 
So you think a child, or a baby, doesn't depend on adults after birth? Bizarre
Child neglect laws require that the child gets external care (like food and shelter) or that care is transfered to another person.
 
Child neglect laws require that the child gets external care (like food and shelter) or that care is transfered to another person.
If a baby isn't taken care of by someone else, will it be able to take care of itself. The obvious answer is No. That's how we've evolved
 
If a baby isn't taken care of by someone else, will it be able to take care of itself. The obvious answer is No. That's how we've evolved
Thats why we came up with clans and tribes and other co-operative groups.

 
If a baby isn't taken care of by someone else, will it be able to take care of itself. The obvious answer is No. That's how we've evolved
At the time of the Tuam mother and children's home was active, what was the still born rate in Ireland?
It operated from 1925 until 1961 according to google.
Why did the RCC get the blame when it was Irish society that forced these young women into the homes.
The church is an easy scapegoat, much easier than looking at the generations that went before us, our parents and grandparents etc.
 
Thats why we came up with clans and tribes and other co-operative groups.

Generally speaking, the parents of a baby are expected to take care of it, if it all possible which, does require, having a body.
 
Generally speaking, the parents of a baby are expected to take care of it, if it all possible which, does require, having a body.
The umbilical cord is cut at birth however. The baby is then no longer a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.
 
The umbilical cord is cut at birth however. The baby is then no longer a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.
Which is the case in almost all abortions. So what's your point?
 
Sure. You agree that in the case of almost all abortions the baby is not a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.
I agree to what you bolded, a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.
 
I agree to what you bolded, a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.
Please don't rely on you not being able to read, for comprehension..

You agree that in the case of almost all abortions the baby is not a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.

R u backtracking, or r u now saying that you don't agree?
 
Please don't rely on you not being able to read, for comprehension..

You agree that in the case of almost all abortions the baby is not a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.

R u backtracking, or r u now saying that you don't agree?
Im not back tracking. You bolded "...a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety." And then went on to say "Which is the case in almost all abortions".

I agree with that. I agree with what you said.

I think you meant to also bold "no longer...", but alas.
 
Im not back tracking. You bolded "...a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety." And then went on to say "Which is the case in almost all abortions".

I agree with that. I agree with what you said.

I think you meant to also bold "no longer...", but alas.
I told you, it doesn't matter how you, ostensibly, misinterpreted what I said, I said this, and I'm saying it again now -

In the case of almost all abortions the baby is not a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.

Do you agree?
 
I told you, it doesn't matter how you, ostensibly, misinterpreted what I said, I said this, and I'm saying it again now -

In the case of almost all abortions the baby is not a possible danger to the mothers physical health and safety.

Do you agree?
No. Giving birth is one of the most dangerous things a woman can do.




View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1gzpq78/how_come_no_one_talks_about_how_dangerous/
 
No. Giving birth is one of the most dangerous things a woman can do.
Where?

Secondly, please tell me what you think the percentage of women who have abortions is because of concerns over their own health and safety?




View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1gzpq78/how_come_no_one_talks_about_how_dangerous/
 
No, what country, Ireland?

Do you think that it's common for women to die in childbirth in Ireland?
Are you subtly moving the goalposts?

Dying is not the only problem a woman can face in childbirth. We are still talking dangers to the mothers physical health and safety.




Ill stop here for tonight. I'll contnue your lesson tomorrow.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom