- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
- Messages
- 2,813
- Reaction score
- 3,689
Professor said:
Actually ,it's you who appear to be doing exactly what Charlotte does. When presented with evidence, it used to discredit the source material and deny the existence of the technology.
Rather than further derail the climate change scam thread I have posted my response to the above post here.
There is a distinct difference between evidence and low key hysterical rants involving the mass throwing of links at the scene of contention.
Now, please point me to where I denied the existence of the technology.
As I note once again, I am not suggesting that weather modification cannot be done, what I do question, however, is the long term viability of doing so. The Chinese are happy to throw all sorts of hardware at the task but do we know just how much energy is required to run these bits of kit? It may well be that they are using the arrays as a weapon, to deprive India of its rains, but they have to be careful not to cause uncontrolled flooding in China itself.
Actually ,it's you who appear to be doing exactly what Charlotte does. When presented with evidence, it used to discredit the source material and deny the existence of the technology.
Rather than further derail the climate change scam thread I have posted my response to the above post here.
There is a distinct difference between evidence and low key hysterical rants involving the mass throwing of links at the scene of contention.
Now, please point me to where I denied the existence of the technology.
As I note once again, I am not suggesting that weather modification cannot be done, what I do question, however, is the long term viability of doing so. The Chinese are happy to throw all sorts of hardware at the task but do we know just how much energy is required to run these bits of kit? It may well be that they are using the arrays as a weapon, to deprive India of its rains, but they have to be careful not to cause uncontrolled flooding in China itself.