Origins Thread

Do you believe in evolution?

  • Total voters
    16
Tiger said:
Ladies and gentlemen, the reason Tank and Jimmy cannot answer the question is straightforward: it exposes a fundamental weakness in the evolutionary fairytale, one that they want to quietly ignore.

Random mutations destroy existing functions, and natural selection could only possibly act on what is already alive and capable of replication. Yet their AI responses (they personally provided zero personal response) want us to be impressed by prebiotic chemistry experiments and impossible hypotheticals, while the real question remains: how did lifeless molecules ever organise themselves into a cell capable of storing and transmitting functional information? Simple.

No schoolyard taunts, no trolling, no clever phrasing, no AI-generated summary, no appeal to “vast stretches of time” can cover the fact that the mechanism for creating life’s first functional information is entirely absent. That is the reality. That's why they are stumped. They won’t engage the debate in good faith. James seems slightly traumatised.

The two trolls will inevitably reply to this post with more trolling and no debate.
Click to expand...
Two trolls or one?🤔
 
  • Facepalm
Reactions: AN2
Tiger said:
Ladies and gentlemen, the reason Tank and Jimmy cannot answer the question is straightforward: it exposes a fundamental weakness in the evolutionary fairytale, one that they want to quietly ignore.

Random mutations destroy existing functions, and natural selection could only possibly act on what is already alive and capable of replication. Yet their AI responses (they personally provided zero personal response) want us to be impressed by prebiotic chemistry experiments and impossible hypotheticals, while the real question remains: how did lifeless molecules ever organise themselves into a cell capable of storing and transmitting functional information? Simple.

No schoolyard taunts, no trolling, no clever phrasing, no AI-generated summary, no appeal to “vast stretches of time” can cover the fact that the mechanism for creating life’s first functional information is entirely absent. That is the reality. That's why they are stumped. They won’t engage the debate in good faith. James seems slightly traumatised.

The two trolls will inevitably reply to this post with more trolling and no debate.
Click to expand...
More AI. But some modifications made before posting, as I know you would.

1000095150.png
 
AN2 said:
I think, objectively, that's all you're doing now..
Click to expand...
Nope, screaming “AI” to every uncomfortable post which rocks your worldview is definitely trolling. Tank has never once engaged in a debate in good faith.
 
Tiger said:
Nope, screaming “AI” to every uncomfortable post which rocks your worldview is trolling.
Click to expand...
More delusion

Your question (which you've slipped abiogenesis into now*) was answered by me 70 posts ago, as has been pointed out to you

*Possibly some part of you understands that a kid could have answered it, and that's why you've now included abiogenesis
 
Tiger said:
Abiogenesis is a fairytale.
Click to expand...
Abiogenesis and evolution are separate

As the dumb creationist you are, you don't understand that, even though you've been told it countless times, literally from day one
 
AN2 said:
Abiogenesis and evolution are separate

As the dumb creationist you are, you don't understand that, even though you've been told it countless times, literally from day one
Click to expand...
Nobody said they’re the same you trolling wally.

They’re both fairytales.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AN2
This is how it's basically worked over the last two days..

Tiger has displayed that he doesn't have even a rudimentary understanding of evolution, asked a supposedly awkward question about it that a child could answer, making a fool of himself, and now he's scrambling for abiogenesis..
 
AN2 said:
This is how it's basically worked over the last two days..

Tiger has displayed that he doesn't have even a rudimentary understanding of evolution, asked a supposedly awkward question about it that a child could answer, making a fool of himself, and now he's scrambling for abiogenesis..
Click to expand...
*yawn

So, Is James…

A) A bonfide simpleton
B) An online troll with no interest in good faith debates
C) A lonely old geezer looking for interaction and stimulation
D) All of the above

Winning answer to be announced later today!
 
Last edited:
AN2 said:
You link the two
Click to expand...
Btw, this is a common tactic from creationists. Let's have a look and see..

AI, does abiogenesis undermine evolution? 🤔

Screenshot_20251024_114833.jpg
 
AN2 said:
Just when you think that the most mentally retarded person on this thread is Tiger...
Click to expand...
Along pops jimmy and his weekend tray of Dutch Gold.:)
 
Tiger said:
*yawn

So, Is James…

A) A bonfide simpleton
B) An online troll with no interest in good faith debates
C) A lonely old geezer looking for interaction and stimulation
D) All of the above

Winning answer to be announced later today!
Click to expand...
 
AN2 said:
Btw, this is a common tactic from creationists. Let's have a look and see..

AI, does abiogenesis undermine evolution? 🤔

View attachment 8323
Click to expand...
Haha, The absolute stench of desperation off of you is palpable.

Can evolution begin in a system with no self-replicating molecules James?
 
Tiger said:
Haha, The absolute stench of desperation off of you is palpable.

Can evolution begin in a system with no self-replicating molecules James?
Click to expand...
lol Oh. My. God.
 
AN2 said:
lol Oh. My. God.
Click to expand...
James ‘the question dodger’Dawson strikes again!

You could have your own TV show James.

Meanwhile….the one sided debate continues…
 
Tiger said:
James ‘the question dodger’Dawson strikes again!
Click to expand...
Deluded

You're basically asking the same nonsensical question as you did in the last Tiger Challenge. You have no ability to learn
 
AN2 said:
Deluded
Click to expand...
If evolution depends entirely on replication, mutation and selection, then how can evolution begin in a system where no self replications molecules exist?

Answers on a postcard please…

(this is the bit where you deflect…)
 
AN2 said:
It doesn't
Click to expand...
Haha, I set the traps and you walk into them Jimmy.

You’ve just contradicted the very definition of evolution, by definition, it requires replication, heritable variation and selection. Without replication, there’s nothing to inherit.

We’ll start tonight’s scoreboard now shall we…

Tiger 1 - 0 DimJim
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AN2
The adolescent brats obviously want to take over this thread now..

Sad
 
Tiger said:
Haha, I set the traps and you walk into them Jimmy.

You’ve just contradicted the very definition of evolution, by definition, it requires replication, heritable variation and selection. Without replication, there’s nothing to inherit.

We’ll start tonight’s scoreboard now shall we…

Tiger 1 - 0 DimJim
Click to expand...
The only traps you ever set are for yourself
 
AN2 said:
The only traps you ever set are for yourself
Click to expand...
James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson strikes again!

So, if (as you tell us) evolution doesn’t depend on replication, heritable variation, or selection, then what exactly is evolving?

We’ll await your erudite answer with bated breath…
 
Tiger said:
Haha, I set the traps and you walk into them Jimmy.

You’ve just contradicted the very definition of evolution
Click to expand...
lol How have I done that? That's ^ your brain on IDiotism, folks

Tiger said:
, by definition, it requires replication, heritable variation and selection. Without replication, there’s nothing to inherit.

We’ll start tonight’s scoreboard now shall we…
Click to expand...
Tiger said:
Tiger 1 - 0 DimJim
Click to expand...
Deluded
 
AN2 said:
What do you mean depends on? 🤣
Click to expand...
It's like you're describing something and then asking - Why does that something "depend on" it being that something

That's your brain on IDiotism folks
 
AN2 said:
What do you mean depends on? 🤣
Click to expand...
Good grief.

It’s ’school time’ again.

I mean the essential preconditions that would make evolution possible.
 
AN2 said:
It's like you're describing something and then asking - Why does that something "depend on" it being that something

That's your brain on IDiotism folks
Click to expand...
👆👆 James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson can’t answer even the most basic of questions.
 
Tiger said:
Good grief.

It’s ’school time’ again.

I mean the essential preconditions that would make evolution possible.
Click to expand...
What preconditions? Again, you're just falling back on abiogenesis..
 
AN2 said:
What preconditions? Again, you're just falling back on abiogenesis..
Click to expand...
Nope. I’m pointing out a logical prerequisite for evolution.

Tiger 2 - 0 DimJim
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AN2
AN2 said:
What preconditions? Again, you're just falling back on abiogenesis..
Click to expand...
It's hilarious because he never reads anything, watches any video etc., blissfully unaware of the fool he's making of himself, read the third bullet point -

Screenshot_20251024_114833.jpg
 
Tiger said:
Nope. I’m pointing out a logical prerequisite for evolution.

Tiger 2 - 0 DimJim
Click to expand...
You're proving exactly what I said about you linking, conflating and so on, evolution and abiogenesis, only a few posts ago

It's hilarious how f*cking stupid you are
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom