Origins Thread

[Tiger]

The only traps you ever set are for yourself

James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson strikes again!

So, if (as you tell us) evolution doesn’t depend on replication, heritable variation, or selection, then what exactly is evolving?

We’ll await your erudite answer with bated breath…

 

[AN2]

Haha, I set the traps and you walk into them Jimmy.

You’ve just contradicted the very definition of evolution

lol How have I done that? That's ^ your brain on IDiotism, folks

, by definition, it requires replication, heritable variation and selection. Without replication, there’s nothing to inherit.

We’ll start tonight’s scoreboard now shall we…

Tiger 1 - 0 DimJim

Deluded

 

[AN2]

James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson strikes again!

So, if (as you tell us) evolution doesn’t depend on replication, heritable variation, or selection, then what exactly is evolving?

What do you mean depends on?

We’ll await your erudite answer with bated breath…

 

[AN2]

What do you mean depends on?

It's like you're describing something and then asking - Why does that something "depend on" it being that something

That's your brain on IDiotism folks

 

[Tiger]

What do you mean depends on?

Good grief.

It’s ’school time’ again.

I mean the essential preconditions that would make evolution possible.

 

[Tiger]

It's like you're describing something and then asking - Why does that something "depend on" it being that something

That's your brain on IDiotism folks

James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson can’t answer even the most basic of questions.

 

[AN2]

Good grief.

It’s ’school time’ again.

I mean the essential preconditions that would make evolution possible.

What preconditions? Again, you're just falling back on abiogenesis..

 

[Tiger]

What preconditions? Again, you're just falling back on abiogenesis..

Nope. I’m pointing out a logical prerequisite for evolution.

Tiger 2 - 0 DimJim

 

[AN2]

What preconditions? Again, you're just falling back on abiogenesis..

It's hilarious because he never reads anything, watches any video etc., blissfully unaware of the fool he's making of himself, read the third bullet point -

 

[AN2]

Nope. I’m pointing out a logical prerequisite for evolution.

Tiger 2 - 0 DimJim

You're proving exactly what I said about you linking, conflating and so on, evolution and abiogenesis, only a few posts ago

It's hilarious how f*cking stupid you are

 

[Tiger]

It's hilarious because he never reads anything, watches any video etc., blissfully unaware of the fool he's making of himself, read the third bullet point -

View attachment 8325

James, genuine question…have you been drinking? You’re literally going back to where we were over an hour ago.

Yes, the imaginary, magical beginning of life from non-life event - known as ‘abiogenesis’ is a different part of the atheist fantasy of how we got here, from the developmentally magical fantasy known as evolution.

You are allergic to discussing how life came from non-life and that’s understandable, because it makes no sense. However, there is still the issue that evolution cannot operate without a first self replicating, information bearing system. You’re simply trying to sidestep the issue, which is how random mutations could plausibly generate the complex, functional information in even the simplest cell. Evolution presupposes replication, variation, and selection; without these preconditions, there is nothing to evolve.

 

[Haven]

Tiger be like...

 

[AN2]

James, genuine question…have you been drinking? You’re literally going back to where we were over an hour ago.

Yes, the imaginary, magical beginning of life from non-life event - known as ‘abiogenesis’ is a different part of the atheist fantasy of how we got here, from the developmentally magical fantasy known as evolution.

You are allergic to discussing how life came from non-life and that’s understandable, because it makes no sense. However, there is still the issue that evolution cannot operate without a first self replicating, information bearing system. You’re simply trying to sidestep the issue, which is how random mutations could plausibly generate the complex, functional information in even the simplest cell. Evolution presupposes replication, variation, and selection; without these preconditions, there is nothing to evolve.

I mean, the levels of tiresomeness and obtuseness from you is unparalleled, champ

I see you've introduced another conflation, namely science and atheism

 

[Tiger]

Tiger be like...

Muh…AI….ehhh

Pathetic. I don’t need AI to eat you and James for breakfast. Why not just admit you have no answers? From Chat GPT or anything else on the internet. Why do you habitually troll?

Reality is reality.

 

[Tiger]

I mean, the levels of tiresomeness and obtuseness from you is unparalleled, champ

I see you've introduced another conflation, namely science and atheism

James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson strikes again….and again….and again…

 

[AN2]

James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson strikes again….and again….and again…

Again, objectively, you can only be described as trolling

 

[Tiger]

Again, objectively, you can only be described as trolling

Asking legitimate questions you can’t answer is not trolling.

 

[AN2]

Asking legitimate questions you can’t answer is not trolling.

Your questions have been answered, troll

 

[Tiger]

Your questions have been answered, troll

Saying….”muh…eh…expansive amounts of time….it’s complex and shit” does not count.

Only legitimate logical, verifiable scientific answers will be accepted.

There has been no proper replies. Shite, incorrect replies don’t count.

 

[AN2]

Saying….”muh…eh…expansive amounts of time….it’s complex and shit” does not count.

Only legitimate logical, verifiable scientific answers will be accepted.

There has been no proper replies. Shite, incorrect replies don’t count.

Haha.. Just blatantly strawmanning now..

 

[Tiger]

Haha.. Just blatantly strawmanning now..

Folks, James is about to win the Nobel prize for science for discovering something that nobody else has. The mystery of life…

Insert link to where you have properly addressed the issue here

 

[AN2]

Folks, James is about to win the Nobel prize for science for discovering something that nobody else has. The mystery of life…

Insert link to where you have properly addressed the issue here

lol That wasn't your question dummy, which you repeatedly embarrassed yourself by repeatedly asking..

 

[Tiger]

lol That wasn't your question dummy, which you repeatedly embarrassed yourself by repeatedly asking..

You’ve dodged so many questions it’s hard to keep up.

The latest question dodge was for this -

So, if (as you tell us) evolution doesn’t depend on replication, heritable variation, or selection, then what exactly is evolving?

or were you referring to one of your many earlier question dodges? Which question are you referring to?

 

[AN2]

Folks, James is about to win the Nobel prize for science for discovering something that nobody else has. The mystery of life…

Insert link to where you have properly addressed the issue here

This is why you're so tiresome, your question about evolution, which could be answered by a child, which you repeatedly asked, was answered

Now, in full desperation mode, you're conflating it with abiogenesis

And to top it all off, as you have been all throughout this thread, you're too much of a snivelling coward to openly state your answer (for the origin of life), instead you hide behind this ID pseudoscience nonsense, twas always thus

 

[AN2]

You’ve dodged so many questions it’s hard to keep up.

The latest question dodge was for this -

So, if (as you tell us) evolution doesn’t depend on replication, heritable variation, or selection, then what exactly is evolving?

or were you referring to one of your many earlier question dodges? Which question are you referring to?

More tiresomeness. The question is stupid. Evolution does "depend" on those things, if you want to put it that way

 

[Wolf]

Muh…AI….ehhh

Pathetic. I don’t need AI to eat you and James for breakfast. Why not just admit you have no answers? From Chat GPT or anything else on the internet. Why do you habitually troll?

Reality is reality.

Hey, at least it keeps they/them off the Ukraine thread, something that's actually relevant to people's lives.

 

[Haven]

Muh…AI….ehhh

Pathetic. I don’t need AI to eat you and James for breakfast.

Yet AI is all you use.

Why not just admit you have no answers? From Chat GPT or anything else on the internet.

Because you will just feed my posts back into an AI tool and instruct it to write a rebuttal and then post that output here.
You are not debating honestly. You are a cheat.

Why do you habitually troll?

Thats pretty ironic!

Reality is reality.

 

[AN2]

Yet AI is all you use.

Because you will just feed my posts back into an AI tool and instruct it to write a rebuttal and then post that output here.

So if you knew which AI tool he's using, then you might be able to show it giving "his" (Tiger's) reply almost word for word?

That would be fairly devastating for poor Tiger. Then again, the guy basically has no shame

 

[Tiger]

Yet AI is all you use.

Says the person who spent most of today using AI to try and debate me and still lost every single debate miserably. Pathetic.

Because you will just feed my posts back into an AI tool and instruct it to write a rebuttal and then post that output here.

Haha, of course- Oh, Tank has all the answers, however it’s that pesky AI that is the only reason he can’t debate and explain his (non) position.

You are not debating honestly. You are a cheat.

You can’t even win an argument against me with the full use of the world’s AI at your disposal. Maybe you should go read and a book or two.

Thats pretty ironic!

You’ve got nothing. Apparently I have access to AI that you don’t, which enables me to win arguments. It has nothing to do with the comlplete absence of any credible scientific data to back up your position. No it’s just AI.

Stupid mong.

 

[Tiger]

So if you knew which AI tool he's using, then you might be able to show it giving "his" (Tiger's) reply almost word for word?

That would be fairly devastating for poor Tiger. Then again, the guy basically has no shame

James, the only reason that I regularly eat you and Tank for breakfast is that I have the entire Russian bot system behind me.

I’m not even a real person. It has nothing to do with the fact that you can’t read and write and that there is no scientific data to back up your position

 

[AN2]

lol He's reached peak delusion

 

[Tiger]

lol He's reached peak delusion

Nope, I’m highlighting how stupid you and the establishment bootlicker - Tank’s arguments against me are. They’re retarded.

It is literally- ‘You are better at using AI than us’. That’s literally your defence.

 

[AN2]

I've already pointed out that you using AI is a red herring (that suits you)

If "Tank" wants to go that way, that's up to him

You're a completely and utterly deluded IDiot, that's the main reason why you have no credibility

Post in thread 'Origins Thread' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/origins-thread.639/post-146788

 

[Haven]

Says the person who spent most of today using AI to try and debate me and still lost every single debate miserably. Pathetic.

I was just pointing out your use of it. I got it to produce two competing views to an article, to make that point.

Either you have stupidly missed the point or you are being willfully dishonest about this. I think the latter.

Haha, of course- Oh, Tank has all the answers, however it’s that pesky AI that is the only reason he can’t debate and explain his (non) position.

You're the one generating posts with it.

You can’t even win an argument against me with the full use of the world’s AI at your disposal. Maybe you should go read and a book or two.

You're the one generating posts with it.

You’ve got nothing. Apparently I have access to AI that you don’t, which enables me to win arguments. It has nothing to do with the comlplete absence of any credible scientific data to back up your position. No it’s just AI.

Is that what you want? Do you want me to debate using AI too? I can do that. Let me know.

Stupid mong.

 

[Haven]

James, genuine question…have you been drinking? You’re literally going back to where we were over an hour ago.

Yes, the imaginary, magical beginning of life from non-life event - known as ‘abiogenesis’ is a different part of the atheist fantasy of how we got here, from the developmentally magical fantasy known as evolution.

You are allergic to discussing how life came from non-life and that’s understandable, because it makes no sense. However, there is still the issue that evolution cannot operate without a first self replicating, information bearing system. You’re simply trying to sidestep the issue, which is how random mutations could plausibly generate the complex, functional information in even the simplest cell. Evolution presupposes replication, variation, and selection; without these preconditions, there is nothing to evolve.

 

[Tiger]

View attachment 8326

That’s me, so we can confidently stick ‘originality Ai’ in the bin. It’s clearly useless.

 

[Hermit]

How many AI detectors did you try before you got the answer you wanted?

I used the first two results from Google search.

91% that the content is human generated.

Not 100% though, and you missed the part in my screenshot that showed one sentence had a 16% likelihood of being AI-generated.

 

[AN2]

That’s me

And stupid

 

[AN2]

Good thread here on why creationists conflate abiogenesis and evolution -


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/j3g7uz/why_do_creationists_always_try_to_say_that/

 

[Haven]

I used the first two results from Google search.

Interesting. Please supply a screenshot.

Not 100% though, and you missed the part in my screenshot that showed one sentence had a 16% likelihood of being AI-generated.

So extremely high chance I wrote it, whiich of course I did.

Thanks dude.