So can you explain why you think that I should be "embarrassed" to talk about abiogenesis, or you just going to dodge as per usual?Stop embarrassing yourself James.
Stop spamming the thread too.
So can you explain why you think that I should be "embarrassed" to talk about abiogenesis, or you just going to dodge as per usual?Stop embarrassing yourself James.
Stop spamming the thread too.
I mean, paragraphs like the above truly astound me. Abiogenesis is "magical" but the creationist (God of the gaps) origin of life, isn't?James, genuine question…have you been drinking? You’re literally going back to where we were over an hour ago.
Yes, the imaginary, magical beginning of life from non-life event - known as ‘abiogenesis’ is a different part of the atheist fantasy of how we got here, from the developmentally magical fantasy known as evolution.
How did I do that?Firstly, you acted like it was embarrassing in the way you were posting about it
I don't believe in "magic"and secondly it’s obvious that someone who thinks life magically started itself somehow, would be embarrassed that they can’t offer up any kind of satisfactory explanation as to how lifeless matter transformed into the first living cell.
Classic.Firstly, you acted like it was embarrassing in the way you were posting about it and secondly it’s obvious that someone who thinks life magically started itself somehow, would be embarrassed that they can’t offer up any kind of satisfactory explanation as to how lifeless matter transformed into the first living cell.
*yawn
How did I do that?
I don't believe in "magic"
Neither you nor I are a biochemist but what's so "magic" about living matter arising from non-living? How much of you do you do you think is living? Is the carbon in your body alive?
This is such a monstrosity of a post AKA a Tiger post*yawn
The AUL knee jerk God of the gaps retort. It’s like a comfort blanket for evolutionists.
The problem is, they’re not so much as gaps as giant abysses. Calling them gaps conveniently ignores that evolution has no mechanism to bridge these vast chasms, from lifeless chemistry to coded functional life.
Haha, James ‘tiny Willy’ Dawson is about to tell us all how lifeless matter transformed into the first living cell.This is such a monstrosity of a post AKA a Tiger post
I suppose I should let @Haven have first dibs (because after I'm finished with it there'll be nothing left)
I find it really lame how you (and Woof) copy MowlHaha, James ‘tiny Willy’ Dawson
is about to tell us all how lifeless matter transformed into the first living cell.
Gather around everyone
Tenner bet his reply doesn’t involve solving the problem and is just mindless guff.
![]()
It’s mad that you think this hopeless response demands reply. It doesn’t. You’ve said nothing as usual.How did I do that?
I don't believe in "magic"
Neither you nor I are a biochemist but what's so "magic" about living matter arising from non-living? How much of you do you do you think is living? Is the carbon in your body alive?
Do I get my tenner now?I find it really lame how you (and Woof) copy Mowl
More hand-waving - entirely predictableIt’s mad that you think this hopeless response demands reply. It doesn’t. You’ve said nothing as usual.
Ignoring your now disbelief in ‘magic’, can you tell us more about the emergence of functional, information-rich, self replicating systems?
Ladies and gentlemen…. James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson strikes again!More hand-waving - entirely predictable
Your questions are answered and are stupid, repetitively soLadies and gentlemen…. James ‘the question dodger’ Dawson strikes again!
Yes, so stupid that you can’t answer them…Your questions are answered and are stupid, repetitively so
Good thread here on why creationists conflate abiogenesis and evolution -
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/j3g7uz/why_do_creationists_always_try_to_say_that/
Yes James, in case you haven’t noticed, we’re awaiting your hypothesis about abiogenesis with bated breath… off you go…Another excellent comment -
It's primarily used as a distraction tool.
The strategy for creationism is to instill doubt rather than formulate hypotheses or do experiments. It's seen as a victory for them if they can point to something where the answer is, "We don't know."
Since we have a lot of evidence for evolution but not abiogenesis, the latter is the preferred gish-gallop target.
Gaps in evolutionApparently James’s enthusiasm to give me a black eye around the enormous abysses he and his gay pal - Tank call ‘gaps’ in evolution and abiogenesis, that he forgot to actually answer the question, so, here it is again:
QEDCan you tell us about how lifeless matter transformed into the first living cell James?
James ‘no debate’ DawsonGaps in evolutionwhat are you blathering about? It's the same thing as always, isn't it. You're conflating abiogensis and evolution. God, you're so tiresome
QED
James ‘no debate’ DawsonGosh, I'd hate to be an IDiot.. ignorance, stupidity, obtuseness, mendacity, deceitfulness, no interest in the truth..
I just couldn't be one
Gaps in evolutionwhat are you blathering about?
Yep, handwaving again. UsualJames ‘no debate’ DawsonLiterally never says anything. Just yappy throwaway guff.
James ‘no debate’ DawsonYep, handwaving again. Usual
Apparently James’s enthusiasm to give me a black eye around the enormous abysses he and his gay pal - Tank call ‘gaps’ in evolution and abiogenesis, that he forgot to actually answer the question, so, here it is again:
Could you Tiger (I've of course given my answer umpteen times)?Can you tell us about how lifeless matter transformed into the first living cell James?
Ok James, you are now on a warning for a 48 hour ban.Could you Tiger (I've of course given my answer umpteen times)?
So, if you want to prove that you're not deceitful, then simply write your hypothesis here:
_____________________________________________
This is my thread as much as it is yours. It should never have been put in your blogOk James, you are now on a warning for a 48 hour ban.
Relentless spam posts followed by a lame attempt asking me to answer my own challenge to you is trolling.
If the next post that you contribute doesn’t attempt to answer any question or contribute to the scientific discussion it is going to be an automatic ban.
Stop spamming and trolling.
You're a weasel liarStoopid is as stoopid does…
Stop spamming the thread you bum.You're a weasel liar
Three consecutive days (a hat-trick) of you humiliating yourself.. you have not taken well
Stop lyingStop spamming the thread you bum.
Interesting. Please supply a screenshot.
By the way, your Originality.ai is on the second page of Google search results, so how many AI detectors did you try before you got the answer you wanted?How many AI detectors did you try before you got the answer you wanted?
None. I checked for the best rated detector, and Originality.ai came up, amongst others.By the way, your Originality.ai is on the second page of Google search results, so how many AI detectors did you try before you got the answer you wanted?