"Tommy Robinson" arrested at "March Against Antisemitism" Rally.

Wolf said:
Once again, another thread.
This one is about Tommy Robinson and antisemiticism is being derailed by the usual Pervert and it's mate...
FFS, mods.🤔
Click to expand...
This thread is about antisemiticism [sic], really? 😆

No, I made a post about the murder of Henry Nowak at the hands of a Sikh, his family and the anti-white British police, perfectly appropriate for this thread considering..


View: https://t.me/EvScr123/9517

The conversation then moved on more broadly to race and crime, which I also think is fine but the two dipshits AKA Moron #1 and Moron #2 have taken it a bit further so I've cut off those avenues (or will take them to the appropriate thread).
 
Last edited:
Ok I’ve set up a dedicated thread on Jambo’s old blog to keep this thread clear.
 
The Equalizer said:
It's hard to put into words what a grifting scumbag this guy is.
Click to expand...
What THE FUCK is your problem? He's saying everything you say in that clip. How the hell can you disagree with him?

You know you, that malnourished bumpkin below in east Clare and that halfwit Collett from the north of England are a tiny group of f*cking weirdos.
 
The Novak case gets worse.

Apparently, worried about online commentary, the Police tried to intervene in the trial to try and paint Novak as the aggressor.
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
What THE FUCK is your problem?
Click to expand...
Tommy and Tommytards.

Myles O'Reilly said:
He's saying everything you say in that clip.
Click to expand...
Eh, no, he doesn't.

Obviously what he's said previously about Sikhs (and Hindoos) is noted and the only mention of race and religion by him in that clip is Pakistani and Muslim (barf) and the rest is mostly about the police.

Remember what he had to say about this guy in his interview with Andrew Goldstein -


View: https://t.me/SteveLawsRN/156

Myles O'Reilly said:
How the hell can you disagree with him?
Click to expand...
He's anti-nationalist.

Myles O'Reilly said:
You know you, that malnourished bumpkin below in east Clare and that halfwit Collett from the north of England are a tiny group of f*cking weirdos.
Click to expand...
They're nationalists. I agree with everyone who's a nationalist, because I am.
 
James is an absolute classic little Britain character.

If I ever move from computers into comedy-writing there’s a wealth of material here.

Actually there’s enough material on Sarsfield’s for a whole cast of characters and seasons upon seasons of shows, isn’t there.
 
There is. You'd be the one with the penchant for darkies and you'd have a Somalian Gimp in your basement :D
 
New mural in Newtownabbey, County Antrim


Mural.jpg
 
Just needs to improved by the the addition of one word "Judaeo-Islam".

Father P Thery was right in the 1950s.
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
Its not often I agree with you Roc
Click to expand...
You agree with him about Tommy.

Doesn't that alone tell you something, do you think that roc would support a nationalist* in a million years?!

*Other than a Zionist, of course
 
The Equalizer said:
You agree with him about Tommy.
Doesn't that alone tell you something, do you think that roc would support a nationalist* in a million years?!
Click to expand...
You’re just a jibbering racist, Jambo.

All I know about Tommy Robinson is what he said in his Oxford Union presentation.

I watched it because I had heard there was notoriety about him, and I simply wanted to hear what he had to say for himself.

I said that he seemed sincere on the basis of this address.

And that what he said about his experiences that drove him, seemed genuine and from the heart.

I noticed he was untrained, not well educated, of the common man with all accompanying human faults - and that this was certainly part of his appeal to the common man.

Now I wouldn’t consider that makes me a “supporter”. (I’ve never even heard him speak outside of that Oxford address.)

Only that I think he is genuine, and as an individual seems to me to be a lot more on the level than the vast majority in the political sphere.

Now as for “nationalism”, you Jambo hold a very particular idea of what this means.

In effect your movement has turned the word into yet more of your jargon, and you bleat the word as such.

Btw I don’t like any mass movement. Rather I like individuals saying what they have to say, from their own experience and perceptions.

Whether Tommy Robinson or anyone else.

Whereas people in a cult or mass movement are not individuals and you can very quickly tell the difference if you are reasonably intelligent and attuned to it.

But back to “nationalism”. Well I would hold the old way the Irish language was spoken, truly reflecting the mind of the Irish man, in the highest regard.

In my book that would be a core current of any worthwhile Irish “nationalism”.

Or let us call it “patriotism” to try and distinguish it from the current ascendant various internet mass movements and jargon pushers.

So I would support most people acting from a feeling of affection for their country, or from devotion to their way of life, and their way of thinking - that they believe is worth everything (without having any desire to force that upon others.)

But mass movements, racists, stupidity, ignorance, I have no truck with. Apparently it is because of that that I “support” your various enemies.

Go wash your butt Jambo.
 
Roc. said:
You’re just a jibbering racist, Jambo.

All I know about Tommy Robinson is what he said in his Oxford Union presentation.

I watched it because I had heard there was notoriety about him, and I simply wanted to hear what he had to say for himself.

I said that he seemed sincere on the basis of this address.

And that what he said about his experiences that drove him, seemed genuine and from the heart.

I noticed he was untrained, not well educated, of the common man with all accompanying human faults - and that this was certainly part of his appeal to the common man.

Now I wouldn’t consider that makes me a “supporter”. (I’ve never even heard him speak outside of that Oxford address.)

Only that I think he is genuine, and as an individual seems to me to be a lot more on the level than the vast majority in the political sphere.

Now as for “nationalism”, you Jambo hold a very particular idea of what this means.

In effect your movement has turned the word into yet more of your jargon, and you bleat the word as such.

Btw I don’t like any mass movement. Rather I like individuals saying what they have to say, from their own experience and perceptions.

Whether Tommy Robinson or anyone else.

Whereas people in a cult or mass movement are not individuals and you can very quickly tell the difference if you are reasonably intelligent and attuned to it.

But back to “nationalism”. Well I would hold the old way the Irish language was spoken, truly reflecting the mind of the Irish man, in the highest regard.

In my book that would be a core current of any worthwhile Irish “nationalism”.

Or let us call it “patriotism” to try and distinguish it from the current ascendant various internet mass movements and jargon pushers.

So I would support most people acting from a feeling of affection for their country, or from devotion to their way of life, and their way of thinking - that they believe is worth everything (without having any desire to force that upon others.)

But mass movements, racists, stupidity, ignorance, I have no truck with. Apparently it is because of that that I “support” your various enemies.

Go wash your butt Jambo.
Click to expand...
I'm perfectly aware of your schtick.. You watched Tommy Robinson's address to the Oxford Union, thought he was sincere, speaking from the heart yada, yada. You're full of shit. You support Tommy because he's an Islamophobic Zionist and against nationalism for wypipo
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
Here's another one in Moygashel

OVAFQK5SEVDLLK3NFJF54B2V3A.jpg
Click to expand...
God bless the Ulster Prods! They may be heretics, but they are jolly heretics. It would be even better if they included Africans and Judaeo Muslims in the unwelcome gang, not just Hindu-Sikhs.

I wonder who they will burn in their free speech bonefires on the 12th? I'm hoping HRH Prince Andy, Epstein, Mandelson, Starmer, Pope Leo and a couple of darkies all half naked in a homo embrace on a refugee inflatable.

But I respect the Ulstermen's choice.
 
A Cop named Tristan Parsons was wrongly identified on social media as being the guy who arrested the dying Henry Novak.

Under a picture of Parsons Elon Musk tweeted "When is this scumbag going to prison?"

Parsons was on holiday in America at the time of Novak's death :LOL:
 
Roc. said:
You’re just a jibbering racist, Jambo.
Click to expand...
Incorrect. I don't jibber

Roc. said:
Now as for “nationalism”, you Jambo hold a very particular idea of what this means.
Click to expand...
roc, you're a Zionist, you know exactly what an ethno-nationalist is, quit the f*cking charade (you're only impressing 75 IQ morons like Gowl)

Roc. said:
Btw I don’t like any mass movement. Rather I like individuals saying what they have to say, from their own experience and perceptions.
Click to expand...
Says a mega Zionist 🤣 Who do you think is falling for your anti-white "individualism" shit, honestly?

Roc. said:
Whereas people in a cult or mass movement are not individuals and you can very quickly tell the difference if you are reasonably intelligent and attuned to it.
Click to expand...
This is an oldie but goodie. It's a speech by Millennial Woes called - The Passion of Jordan Peterson -


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/WQQjpKnuGYlT

.. about the naivety of individualism (by the likes of Jordan Peterson).

I highly recommend listening to it, if you have the time. Not you of course, you don't listen to anyone or anything that doesn't have the same predetermined opinion, you are the Soapbox Dunce, as I titled you.

Roc. said:
But back to “nationalism”.

Or let us call it “patriotism”
Click to expand...
IMG_20260609_053234_129.jpg


Roc. said:
Go wash your butt Jambo.
Click to expand...
 
Those are victims of homicides.

Of course statistics are dumb. The challenge is to form good hypotheses about cause and effect.

In this regard I dug down more into these statistics. One marker that really jumped out was how high the rate was in the District of Colombia. Multiples of other places.

I read this:

“… The city struggles with historic economic inequality and racial segregation. The highest rates of violence occur east of the Anacostia River and in historically marginalized, under-resourced neighborhoods where systemic disparities in employment, housing, and education persist…”.

It also struck me that researchers demonstrated that “… the drivers of violence in the nation's capital are highly concentrated among a very small fraction of the city's overall population…”.

So maybe this will help people get closer to the truth in helping explain the above figures. Let’s try to think intelligently and not jump to conclusions like Neanderthals, eh. 🙄
 
Roc. said:
Those are victims of homicides.

Of course statistics are dumb. The challenge is to form good hypotheses about cause and effect.

In this regard I dug down more into these statistics. One marker that really jumped out was how high the rate was in the District of Colombia. Multiples of other places.

I read this:

“… The city struggles with historic economic inequality and racial segregation. The highest rates of violence occur east of the Anacostia River and in historically marginalized, under-resourced neighborhoods where systemic disparities in employment, housing, and education persist…”.

It also struck me that researchers demonstrated that “… the drivers of violence in the nation's capital are highly concentrated among a very small fraction of the city's overall population…”.
Click to expand...
Roc. said:
So maybe this will help people get closer to the truth in helping explain the above figures.
Click to expand...
You are allergic to the truth. You are a disgusting, depraved, subversive, anti-white Jew. Get the f*ck out of my country #letsmakeit110

Roc. said:
Let’s try to think intelligently and not jump to conclusions like Neanderthals, eh. 🙄
Click to expand...
 
“The truth”.

Isn’t the question above - why are young black people killing each other at such a high rate?

Again, I’m not Jewish. This is just a device you have to signal to other Neanderthals that while you have no argument I must not be listened to.

How do you get at the truth?

In a civilised society an open debate on this question should be welcomed, and alternative views respectfully exchanged. Because that is how you get at the truth.

Of course there is a problem with this aspiration for this kind of debate on this question, the very stuff of civilised society.

Vis, in one part of white society there is an uncivilised element that has the same answer to everything.

They answer that black people are animals, that in fact it is they who are uncivilised, oh, and also it’s the Jews.

We see this is a fast growing pervasive element in the US and UK, mostly because of the internet - and as we observe there are fast growing factions in this country too.

This element I believe is also bound up in this chain of cause and effect. - Quantum physics tells us that the observer strongly figures in any outcome reality.

In this regard if we hypothesise about this element perhaps we might point to the kind of food they eat, their lifestyle, the way they were brought up, and how they were more often than not damaged as children, in the manner we know Jambo was for instance.

And then we see actually these small pockets of young blacks who are killing each other at such high rates also have the same affliction.

Is that not striking?

There is something else also.

I.e. let us notice that you Neanderthals don’t actually care about stopping it. For you, the fact that there is such a high rate of black on black murder is taken as “evidence” of your racist hypotheses.

And we see above how very very upset you get when any kind of challenge to your hypotheses is presented.

Contrary to any conception of normal accepted western Scientific values.

Which also must bring to mind again that white on black racism was systemic for a long time in the US - where your white supremacist ideology that you have imported originated.

And in this regard, here is something interesting- let us cast our minds back to what some of the men who fought to undo this systemic racism in the society they lived in, said about the men who were the driving force behind the racism in their society.


View: https://x.com/africanarchives/status/2064392207524565408

Of course it’s sixty years later and things have much progressed. I don’t think it directly applies in our own era.

But I highlight it because it is clear you Neanderthals are in an important sense happy that poor blacks are killing each other.

And I think that may be at least one significant factor in the chain of cause and effect.
 
Roc. said:
“The truth”.

Isn’t the question above - why are young black people killing each other at such a high rate?

Again, I’m not Jewish. This is just a device you have to signal to other Neanderthals that while you have no argument I must not be listened to.
Click to expand...
Roc. said:
How do you get at the truth?
Click to expand...
The truth is race.

And, really, that's the reason I'm a staunch race realist. That's why I have the arguments I have with you about (biological) race, because race denialism is an anti-white lie.

Roc. said:
In a civilised society an open debate on this question should be welcomed, and alternative views respectfully exchanged. Because that is how you get at the truth.

Of course there is a problem with this aspiration for this kind of debate on this question, the very stuff of civilised society.

Vis, in one part of white society there is an uncivilised element that has the same answer to everything.

They answer that black people are animals, that in fact it is they who are uncivilised, oh, and also it’s the Jews.

We see this is a fast growing pervasive element in the US and UK, mostly because of the internet - and as we observe there are fast growing factions in this country too.
Click to expand...
Roc. said:
This element I believe is also bound up in this chain of cause and effect. - Quantum physics tells us that the observer strongly figures in any outcome reality.
Click to expand...
Einstein once asked - Is the Moon not there if I'm not looking at it?

Physicists don't believe that human consciousness plays a role in the collapse of the wave function, which is what you're referring to.

Roc. said:
In this regard if we hypothesise about this element perhaps we might point to the kind of food they eat, their lifestyle, the way they were brought up, and how they were more often than not damaged as children, in the manner we know Jambo was for instance.

And then we see actually these small pockets of young blacks who are killing each other at such high rates also have the same affliction.

Is that not striking?

There is something else also.

I.e. let us notice that you Neanderthals don’t actually care about stopping it. For you, the fact that there is such a high rate of black on black murder is taken as “evidence” of your racist hypotheses.

And we see above how very very upset you get when any kind of challenge to your hypotheses is presented.

Contrary to any conception of normal accepted western Scientific values.

Which also must bring to mind again that white on black racism was systemic for a long time in the US - where your white supremacist ideology that you have imported originated.

And in this regard, here is something interesting- let us cast our minds back to what some of the men who fought to undo this systemic racism in the society they lived in, said about the men who were the driving force behind the racism in their society.


View: https://x.com/africanarchives/status/2064392207524565408

Of course it’s sixty years later and things have much progressed. I don’t think it directly applies in our own era.

But I highlight it because it is clear you Neanderthals are in an important sense happy that poor blacks are killing each other.

And I think that may be at least one significant factor in the chain of cause and effect.
Click to expand...
 
The Equalizer said:
“race realist”, “race denialism, “anti-white“…
Click to expand...
Jargon

“… the arguments I have with you…”.
Click to expand...
We don’t have arguments.

People cannot by definition argue against jargon.

Which is exactly why you use it.

Jargon refers to the specialized vocabulary or phrases used by insiders of a specific group. While it allows insiders to communicate more easily…

“The key feature of jargon is that it is language that makes it hard for those 'not in the know' to understand what you are talking about .”

“When applied to dogma—a set of principles or beliefs authoritatively laid down by an ideology or religion—jargon acts as the specific vocabulary used to enforce, explain, and maintain those institutionalized beliefs.”
 
And I said “… Quantum physics tells us that the observer strongly figures in any outcome reality…”.

Einstein talking about the moon back in the beginning of these disoveries doesn’t figure.

Later on in assessing the discovery of quantum entanglement for instance Einstein referred to it as “spooky action at a distance.”

I never claimed human consciousness was involved. Science is unsure what is involved.

But something is definitely happening. And that inevitably bears on how we think about the world.

The world that quantum physics describes is exponentially unlike even what molecular level physics describes (that as we already know you cannot conceive of as it doesn’t match what your eyes tell you, i.e skin colour).

So let’s not even think about moving onto quantum physics.
 
Roc. said:
And I said “… Quantum physics tells us that the observer strongly figures in any outcome reality…”.

Einstein talking about the moon back in the beginning of these disoveries doesn’t figure.

Later on in assessing the discovery of quantum entanglement for instance Einstein referred to it as “spooky action at a distance.”

I never claimed human consciousness was involved. Science is unsure what is involved.

But something is definitely happening. And that inevitably bears on how we think about the world.

The world that quantum physics describes is exponentially unlike even what molecular level physics describes (that as we already know you cannot conceive of as it doesn’t match what your eyes tell you, i.e skin colour).

So let’s not even think about moving onto quantum physics.
Click to expand...
A word to the wise @Roc.

You write like you’re ‘off your tits’ most of the time. Rambling and incoherent.

Do you partake in any recreational drugs on a daily/regular basis perchance?
 
Roc. said:
And I said “… Quantum physics tells us that the observer strongly figures in any outcome reality…”.
Click to expand...
And I told you, if you're talking about a conscious observer e.g. a human - that isn't the case

Roc. said:
Einstein talking about the moon back in the beginning of these disoveries doesn’t figure.

Later on in assessing the discovery of quantum entanglement for instance Einstein referred to it as “spooky action at a distance.”

I never claimed human consciousness was involved. Science is unsure what is involved.

But something is definitely happening. And that inevitably bears on how we think about the world.

The world that quantum physics describes is exponentially unlike even what molecular level physics describes (that as we already know you cannot conceive of as it doesn’t match what your eyes tell you, i.e skin colour).

So let’s not even think about moving onto quantum physics.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom