To The Moon

Professor said:
The thing about Moon Hoax Theory is that the idea of Hoax is just too much to believe these days, for a range of reasons but put simply & effectively - It's all too much effort to maintain the Fake performance.

Can you imagine how many scientists, astronauts, manufacturers, analysts, around the world have to be in on it in every minute detail - Faking all the evidence including moon rocks???🤪

C'mon Maan!!🤣
Click to expand...
"I can't believe it, therefore it's not true" is a logical fallacy known as Argument from incredulity.

Argument from incredulity, also known as argument from personal incredulity, appeal to common sense, or the divine fallacy,[1] is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine.
Click to expand...

Argument from incredulity - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

The argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone decides that something did not happen or does not exist because they cannot personally understand the workings.
Click to expand...

Argument from incredulity

The argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone decides that something did not happen or does not exist because they cannot personally understand the workings.
rationalwiki.org rationalwiki.org
 
Professor said:
But they use different fuels which emit little visible light waves or smoke - think of camping gas - no smoke!
Cool flames are near invisible as are wood alcohol fires!!;)
Click to expand...
Totally and utterly wrong. Anyone else have a view. Google the various You Tube videos on hypergolic combustion.
 
Professor said:
But they use different fuels which emit little visible light waves or smoke - think of camping gas - no smoke!
Cool flames are near invisible as are wood alcohol fires!!;)
Click to expand...
Have you any idea about the difference between the combustion of Aerozine 50 propellent and
methylated spirits fuel? Give a go to answer.
 
valamhic said:
Have you any idea about the difference between the combustion of Aerozine 50 propellent and
methylated spirits fuel? Give a go to answer.
Click to expand...
Off the top without checking, at a guess it could be that the Aerozine50 is an integral which has the oxygen needed already in the fuel whereas the methylated requires atmospheric oxygen to combust, same as methanol which produces the invisible(almost)/smokeless fires which racing car drivers are scared of.
Is that it?
 
Professor said:
Off the top without checking, at a guess it could be that the Aerozine50 is an integral which has the oxygen needed already in the fuel whereas the methylated requires atmospheric oxygen to combust, same as methanol which produces the invisible(almost)/smokeless fires which racing car drivers are scared of.
Is that it?
Click to expand...
No. All fuels require oxygen which is practically supplied from the air 20% or from a separate source such as a cylinder in oxy acetylene torch or by incorporation a chemical which converts to oxygen on combustion such as potassium nitrate in gun powder. Methanal was not used in
the Apollo missions. NASA say it was hydrazine 50. This fuel is ignited as close to instantaneously
as realistically possible when the two chemicals are brought together. https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervi...rmat=snrjson&jsoncbid=0&mmscn=vwrc&mid=E07A02
 
What is the point of posting on a site where all sorts of ridiculous giberage is pushed. There should be a children's site for that. I have more to do with my time than trying imbecilic education to unwilling recipients. I post on another site by invitation where there is none of this childishness and while I might invite Coal on it, it I had the power to do so. No one else would come close.
 
valamhic said:
What is the point of posting on a site where all sorts of ridiculous giberage is pushed. There should be a children's site for that. I have more to do with my time than trying imbecilic education to unwilling recipients. I post on another site by invitation where there is none of this childishness and while I might invite Coal on it, it I had the power to do so. No one else would come close.
Click to expand...

Yeah but that Other Site isn't a Virtual Pub, is it?
The discussion here has enormous potential, depending how your mind is Geared;)
What are you talking about? Is it related to anything of importance?
Don't forget there are many and new truths emerging on the cutting edge:unsure:
 
valamhic said:
Does everyone agree hypergolic rockets emit frame and smoke when firing irrespective of where it is fired. In earths atmosphere and in the vacuum of space there has to be frame and smoke. Film of Apollo 15 and 17 ascent modules show neither
Click to expand...

Yeah but, what about when then thrusters are switched to non-hypergolic liquid propellants??
 
He is approaching middle age so that is a mid life crisis
 
Yeah but, the antenna has other qualities such as it's more like a tent pole which is 2-3 pieces which slot together.
Obviously with it being Space Tech it's machined to the finest tolerances, no need for telescopic which would be considerably weaker when extended.
Imagine a solid pole with a 6mm cored out centre through out the length, a 5mm titanium cable is threaded through out the whole pole which pulls the 3 sections together with an unbreakable/unbendable force when screw tensioned on the inside
See? It's easy when you know how. :geek:
 
What has that to do with the fact the antenna is longer than the craft is wide
 
Declan said:
What has that to do with the fact the antenna is longer than the craft is wide
Click to expand...
True. A solid pole is stored horizontally and then when needed initially extended diagonally until a point where it can be brought to the vertical.
Certainly there are a few different designs which the engineers could choose from and ultimately - it could actually be a Telescopic pole in the first place!!😆
 
Maybe they just stuck it out the window or the postman straightened it out
 
Declan said:
Maybe they just stuck it out the window or the postman straightened it out
Click to expand...
Exactly, there's many ways of rigging up a space craft, it's no big deal so long as it works OK and can be proven to do so.

space-jump-meta-767558261.jpg


Red Bull Posting The Proof.
 
Lucky the postman had a camera in those days
 
Rarly Thusday morning is the latest attempt.
 
Mad as Fish said:
All that I see here is a bunch of audio visual type students being given a few tenners and told to go away and make a vid about spaceships and all that sort of stuff. Two things stand out, they haven't a clue about the subject, and they don't really care anyway.
Click to expand...
The spaceship panels look like a welded oil drum. It must be a bogus vid faked/frauded to be official NASA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom