I'm not talking about rockets. I'm talking about the impossibility of the gas pressure which we have on earth existing next to a vacuum (space). Space is impossible, therefore all claims of going to the moon or space are false.
Right, well that needs to be discussed separately because I am juggling a few balls. So clarify if you agree on the basics. Air pressure is at 1 bar at sea level. Do you agree its pressure reduced with elevation?
Are you saying that it is not possible to have a gas pressure gradient in a container?
onepetro.org
flatearth.ws
That would be gas.
Pity we could not have a sensible discussion here but that's life. It will hardly be proved in out lifetime and I reckon no one cares a damn. The young of to day don't know men claimed they were on the moon and therefore don't care if that is true or false.
"Pressure gradients in the atmosphere are typically caused by air of different temperatures"
You claimed gas pressure is constant in a container and asked me to show proof of gas pressure gradient in a container, which I did. You were wrong, even FlatEarth.ws disagreed with your claim. Concede you were wrong.
"Pressure is caused by gas molecules hitting the walls of the container."
Okay, go outside with your tape and sticks and measure a cubic metre of air, without a container, and measure the pressure of that cubic metre of air.
Val, I am trying to give you and others a better argument against the moon landing. I'm citing gas pressure physics, not my opinions. But instead of considering and evaluating what I've presented, and presenting your counter arguments if you disagree, you say I'm off my rocker, you try to backseat moderate the thread and appeal to daddy to get me thread banned.
So you can have a gas pressure gradient in a container?
Great, so if you agree that a gas pressure gradient is possible in a container, then you also agree that a gas pressure gradient is possible if the atmosphere is inside a container. But that contradicts what you previously said:
The thing is that it's easy to show that the Earth is flat these days (but yet the simple evidence is lacking)
It would not be constant, because heat from the sun and heat generated by human activity affects the temperate of the air which affects the pressure.
Fine, it has run its course, for now.
Some fella with a Jack-Hammer on the moon !Any new Chinese fake moon videos? You'd imagine there would be a live feed going, solar powered given this historic event!?
There are a few real pictures but most videos are make privately.Any new Chinese fake moon videos? You'd imagine there would be a live feed going, solar powered given this historic event!?
That will not happen til they land on the moon so you are going noplace any time soon, we are 56 years and counting since they supposedly circled the moon using slide rules for computing
Yes, you have the job. will put to you a few questions to answer.
Apollo 8 - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Val, do you need a researcher for your YT channel?
Because you don't know what the fuck you are talking about here.
www.nbcnews.com
I believe the definition of space should be changed to beyond low earth orbit. Now it is simply above the atmosphere, still protected from stelar and interstellar radiation. That is just glorifiedSpaceX targeting July 31 for launch of historic Polaris Dawn astronaut mission
It will be the second spaceflight for billionaire Jared Isaacman.www.space.com
This could be good. Maybe the radiation will fry him
You're not up to date on the latest space pseudoscience - earth's atmosphere is now said to go beyond the moon:
Horse manure, you try living on the moon.You're not up to date on the latest space pseudoscience - earth's atmosphere is now said to go beyond the moon:
Earth’s atmosphere stretches out to the Moon – and beyond
The outermost part of our planet’s atmosphere extends well beyond the lunar orbit – almost twice the distance to the Moon.www.esa.int
Yeah I know it's bullshit, that's what I called it pseudoscience.
Or here's a mad thought.The thing about Moon Hoax Theory is that the idea of Hoax is just too much to believe these days, for a range of reasons but put simply & effectively - It's all too much effort to maintain the Fake performance.
Can you imagine how many scientists, astronauts, manufacturers, analysts, around the world have to be in on it in every minute detail - Faking all the evidence including moon rocks???
C'mon Maan!!
Agreed, that's the loose thread of sorts, there should be many different and sensational real views of the moon from various stages, after all we see so much live detail of the moon with our new 'Home Quality' backyard telescopes, so yeah - your skepticism and doubts are shared and are real concerns
