To The Moon

[PlunkettsGhost]

My July 15 prophecy has come true:

To The Moon

But we do, just not one that fits the materialist narrative. This is the bigger picture . Science has become captured by one particular worldview and non shall be allowed to brook it. I see. So what is your model of explanation for the observable phenomenon of throwing something in the air and...

www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com

 

[Declan]

nothing that I have seen could be described as a real photo showing anything worthwhile. It would not surprise me it both craft failed to soft land

Well one is certainly kaput and the latest is that the Indian attempt is Tuesday/Wednesday. It has an orbiter but it is to study earth and maybe does not have a camera at all maybe looking to the moon.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Well one is certainly kaput and the latest is that the Indian attempt is Tuesday/Wednesday. It has an orbiter but it is to study earth and maybe does not have a camera at all maybe looking to the moon.

It's all a farcical fake. The Chinese 'space station' videos are a hoot.

 

[Declan]

I am not so sure about that. I think the craft crashed.

 

[Professor]

I am not so sure about that. I think the craft crashed.

Why, could it have been sabotaged?

 

[Declan]

Surely it could have its electronics fried by a lazer beam.


But even without interference, a soft landing is nearly impossible imo, especially remotely.

Let's see it the dots have better luck in a few days.

 

[Fishalt]

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

It's difficult to find, but I once saw claimed Mars Rover video with a fly landing on the rover and walking on its surface. All filmed on Devon Island, Canada.

 

[Mad as Fish]

It's difficult to find, but I once saw claimed Mars Rover video with a fly landing on the rover and walking on its surface. All filmed on Devon Island, Canada.

Same here, I heard the story but never saw anything to back it up.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Same here, I heard the story but never saw anything to back it up.

YouTube changed their algorithms a while ago so you can't find older video unless you know the exact name. Accounts have years worth of video, with most no longer scrollable by date. They are still on YouTube , just not visible in the account catalogue.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

I take it all back:


View: https://twitter.com/narrative_hole/status/1694028111791194403

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

View: https://twitter.com/TheFlatEartherr/status/1694273709849116745

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Who filmed the landing? Apparently this didn't appear an important question to the Chinese

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

View: https://twitter.com/banthebbc/status/1694337136021934180

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Seriously, the Indian CGI team took the day off today, clearly. So bad!

 

[Coal Gas and peat]

Mr spoon went to button moon in the 80's in his converted beans tin and funnel

 

[Professor]

Who filmed the landing? Apparently this didn't appear an important question to the Chinese

Agreed from what we can see so far, how was such camera control achieved, why no dust or shaking from such an obvious heavy landing??
Also I must agree with your criticism of the recorded footage presented from most of the missions, the images can hardly be taken seriously and are poorly explained from source.
Cheers!

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Mr spoon went to button moon in the 80's in his converted beans tin and funnel

View attachment 2188

The irony here is that Button Moon cosmology is likely closer to reality than the NASA fairy-tale

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

View: https://twitter.com/TheFlatEartherr/status/1694394622582087696

 

[Professor]

View: https://twitter.com/TheFlatEartherr/status/1694394622582087696

The vid has similar qualities to a 50's animation cartoon and again - Whose doing the camera work? and where is the touchdown?
It looks daft, so far.